The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017

 The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words. 

The graph elucidates the number of tourists visiting a Caribbean Island between the period of 2010 and 2017.

Overall, the visitors staying on cruise ships and the total number of visitors experienced similar trends. The former increased upto 2011, however, declined in 2012; they further increased up till 2017. Similarly, the total numbers of visitors rose upto 2015; the trend remained constant till 2016 and spiked in 2017.

In 2010, the visitors on ships rose to 0.5 million, but fell to approximately 0.25 in 2012. They then experienced an upward trend till 2017 to 2 million. However, the visitors staying on the island remained constant till 2011 at almost 0.75; the number of visitors increased upto  2013 to 2.0, but remained unchanged till 2015, and decreased up to 2016 to nearly 1.5 million. However, it slightly increased to 1.5 up to 2017.

The total visitors went up over 3.0 million up to  2015; thereafter, after a dip till 2016, it witnessed a surge to 3.5.  

The Bar graph below shows the percentage of waste recyled by housholds of a city in the year 1992, 1997 and 2002. Summarise and compare where relevant.

The Bar graph below shows the percentage of waste recyled by housholds of a city in the  year 1992, 1997 and 2002. 
Summarise and compare where relevant. 
Write at least 150 words 

The supplied graph elucidates and compares the proportion of distinct categories of domestic refuse reprocessed in a city from 1992 to 2002.

At the outset, in 1992, cans were the highest recycled products with almost 13%, followed by plastic and paper with a negligible difference as compared to the former, and glass was the lowest. Nonetheless, from 1992 to 1997, glass increased to nearly 29%, whereas paper and plastic also registered an increment, reaching to around 18% and 11% respectively, but cans dipped to 11% approximately which was the least.

Similarly, between 1997 and 2002, recycling of the glass witnessed an exponential rise to almost 49%, followed by paper and the cans that climbed to  almost 29% and 21% respectively; however, the percentage of plastic recycled remained unchanged.

Overall, it is conspicuous that glass had accounted for an upward movement and paper also witnessed the similar pattern. Nevertheless, cans went through an oscillating trend, whereas the proportion of plastic reused was stable after an initial rise.

The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018

The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018. 

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 

The given line graph elucidates and compares the patterns of opening and closure of shops in a country between 2011 and 2018.      

In general, in 2011, approximately 8500 new outlets were established, but over the next year up to 2012 numbers slid down sharply to under 4000. From 2012-2014 there was an increment of more than 2000 shops being opened, the number reaching to over 6000. Moving further, there was a decline over the next four years; fewer stores were opened with the figures plummeting to 3000 by 2018, even though there was a stability for two years between 2015 and 2017 when both years saw yearly 4000 shops starting each year.

In continuation, although the number of stores shutting down experienced similar patterns, they overtook the figures of new openings. In 2011, almost 6200 shops  closed, and between 2011 and 2014 there was an ascent to 6400 following fluctuations. From 2014-2015 there was a notable dip to almost 700, but by 2018 it climbed back to over 5000.

The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.

The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
Write a summary for a university professor by mentioning and comparing the relevant details.
Write at least 150 words   

The given graphs elucidate and compare patterns of age-wise marriages of males and females between 1996 and 2008

In 1996, in the case of females, the number of individuals marrying was lowest in the 16-19 group, nearly 1%, but the ratio rose up to 25-29, touching almost 12%. Beyond that age group, the percentage dipped gradually, reaching 2% in the 40-44 group. Further, the males also registered a similar pattern with numbers peaking at 25-29 and 30-34 groups, approximately 9%. In this case too, the numbers fell to under 6% in 40-44 group. 

In contrast, although the trend in the former gender remained almost identical with 25-29 registering similar number of marriages, there was a decline in some groups: 20-24, falling from 6 to almost 3% and 35-39, plunging from 4 to almost 2%, but 30-34 witnessed a rise from about 7 to 8%, the latter gender saw a shift in highest to 35-39 group that climbed to nearly 12 from 7%. Other groups registered falls and rises.